 |
Replies to this topic | |
|
jonnysled | Fri Mar-19-10 11:11 AM |
Member since May 28th 2003
4447 posts
|    |
|
#3. "RE: Does Line color really matter ?"
In response to Reply # 2
|
colors are over-rated in catching muskies. the lateral line, reactions and size mean so much more.
they are good at catching people though.
black double 10 black depth raider black grandma black pacemaker black weagle black pounder ...
you could do a whole season in 6 baits if you wanted to dragin' it with any leader and any line. spend your money on the reel, rod and your gas-money ... the investment in time on the water is the one that will catch you the most fish.
the rest = the tackle industry catching customers ambassador of kwan .. deliverer of logic .. mirror to the obvious
|
|
|
|
JOCKO | Fri Mar-19-10 11:24 AM |
Member since Nov 16th 2007
465 posts
|    |
|
#4. "RE: Does Line color really matter ?"
In response to Reply # 3
Fri Mar-19-10 11:24 AM by JOCKO
|
I always keep Doug Johnson's (famous LOTW's guide) quote in mind concerning musky behavior ,,,, "If it moves, its food" ,,,, finding musky location is the toughest part of the equation ,,,, finding "time on the water" is the toughest part of the human equation --------- Jocko
|
|
|
|
muskihntr | Fri Mar-19-10 11:32 AM |
Charter member
2890 posts
|    |
|
#5. "RE: Does Line color really matter ?"
In response to Reply # 3
|
I dont know if line color matters or not, I know guys who use bright yellow and catch fish. I have experimented with red line and caught fish. 90% of the time I use the moss green color. Honestly dont know if it makes a difference or not.
Sled you can go with those 6 baits for a season if you like, they are all great baits that will definetly catch fish. However I wouldnt sell people on that is all they need. Its simply not true. The last couple falls were great eye openers for me on what some other baits could do when nothing else worked. The more time you spend on the water, the more you learn about the applications of some of the other baits out there, and how they can shine when the other stuff doesnt.
Time on the water! STEALTH TACKLE "CLEARLY THE LEADER" http://www.stealthtackle.net
|
|
| |
|
#6. "RE: Does Line color really matter ?"
In response to Reply # 0
|
Hi:
For line, in most cases, I don't think so. A lot of superline sold to musky fishermen starts out as green but since Spectra fibers don't retain color well they eventually fade to a light brown with time. (This is not an indicator of line deterioration.) I've never noticed a difference in fish-catching during the different stages of fade.
That said, when I used PowerPro's Phantom Red a few years back in clear water, it was a total disaster. The thinking behind red line is that red is the first color of the light spectrum to be filtered out by water, so it would help make this line disappear, or at least less noticeable. Maybe that worked in deeper water applications, but in the top 10 feet or so of the water column (most musky applications) it had minimal effect, if any. I would not use it again.
I am convinced that fish notice leaders. Who knows that they think they are. I am sold on fluorocarbon and will use it for most applications.
Steve Heiting
www.steveheiting.com
|
|
|
|
BLL_BIGFISH | Fri Mar-19-10 01:20 PM |
Member since Dec 23rd 2004
657 posts
|    |
|
#8. "RE: Does Line color really matter ?"
In response to Reply # 7
|
Used clear, black, white, black/white, green, yellow, blue flouro, gray, and caught fish on all of them.
I don't suspect it normally matters, but I do think some days it might make a difference. Trouble is, who switches line colors like lure colors?
I'm sure that some days lure color does matter, though other days it may not.
Why would line be different? Maybe this year I'll try different line colors to see, though I don't think that musky action is usually frequent enough to trend line variations along with all the other variables. Bruce
|
|
|
|
BLL_BIGFISH | Fri Mar-19-10 10:17 PM |
Member since Dec 23rd 2004
657 posts
|    |
|
#12. "RE: Does Line color really matter ?"
In response to Reply # 11
Fri Mar-19-10 10:22 PM by BLL_BIGFISH
|
Read and was enthralled by Spoonplugging about 30 years ago, and will admit I've caught some fish using bottom bouncing techniques, including my first legal musky, which I caught on a Hellbender, bouncing bottom, and my first musky, which was caught jigging a spoon on a breakline where deep and shallow water merged. (a bar)
That said, even Buck Perry sold lures in multiple colors and taught principles about matching lure colors to water color.
I think much of what Perry taught is not factual. Fact is that fishing success is not as simple as depth and speed control, though they are no doubt significant factors.
Fact is that many big fish spend much of their lives suspending, following baitfish. Sure, there are seasonal factors where they use breaklines and breaks on those breaklines, but much of the time they are unrelated to fishing success.
Oh, by the way, I'm sure I saw some early Spoonpluggers on Sandbar Lake, in Ontario, in early summer of 1970. I watched as they caught huge walleyes, one after another, on trolling passes over a specific spot they had found. It still excites me to this day. Bruce
|
|
|
|
jerryb | Sat Mar-20-10 05:07 PM |
Member since Jan 27th 2002
148 posts
|    |
|
#18. "RE: Does Line color really matter ?"
In response to Reply # 12
|
Spoonplugger,
Congratulations on your success!
If the typical fisherman put as much thought into the "where" as they do the how, they would see a boom in catches immediately.
Buck said in the gray booklet, "Generations of habits are not easily displaced."
Mr. Perry said he only needed 3 colors, a bright one, a dark one, and a in between or neutral. However Spoonplugs are available today in 73 different colors and schemes. Buck did this for only one reason and it wasn't to catch more fish, but to catch more fishermen. Jerry Borst Spoonplugger/Instructor Heavy Duty Lure Retrievers http://spoonplug.net/spoonplug/lure_retriever.html
|
|
|
|
muskihntr | Sat Mar-20-10 01:23 PM |
Charter member
2890 posts
|    |
|
#17. "RE: Does Line color really matter ?"
In response to Reply # 16
|
Weve been testing and experimenting with Colored and Camo Fluorocarbons since early last year. We have not expereinced any noticable difference in our catch rates with the Colored (Pink) or the Camo, over the Standard Clear. I didnt get my hands on the Camo stuff til mid sesaon and we will continue using it this year as well to see if we can see any noticable difference. My personal preferance is still clear, but weve gotten some nice fish on the colored and camo as well. Id say use what you have the most confidence in.
Same goes with the line color. If you find something works well for you then stick with it. STEALTH TACKLE "CLEARLY THE LEADER" http://www.stealthtackle.net
|
|
| |
|
#23. "RE: Does Line color really matter ?"
In response to Reply # 22
|
We need a poll on this. What color line works best? I vote blue cuz that's the color of the sky. ...I think.
...but you'll have to wait to see how I vote once the poll is presented...but I'll vote blue. ...or ...not. ------------------------ Bart Starr
5-1 Record in title games 9-1 Record in playoffs
...nuff said.
|
|
|
|
muskie_addict | Thu Mar-25-10 01:16 PM |
Member since Aug 11th 2004
370 posts
|    |
|
#28. "RE: Does Line color really matter ?"
In response to Reply # 27
|
A friend of a friend showed me one time that he was using a flat-tipped black sharpie to darken the last 6-8' of his line. Felt it made the line less visible to fish. I bought into it. Still do it.
Haven't noticed a difference that I can point to in terms of fish caught or not caught. However, an unexpected bonus is in super dark water conditions, I know when I'm within 6-8 feet of my bait when the darkened line shows up, and I know mentally about how long after that to go into my F8.
-Eric "My three favorite words are...FISH, FISH, FISH!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|  |